SEINFELD BLOG

No no no no no no no. Once the thread becomes about something, it isn't a thread about nothing anymore, anything goes, and then it's Thunderdome!

Well, maybe in philosophy. But, even nothing is something.... or something?

I take care of this.

Right now the thread about nothing is only a notion, but I think I can get money to make it into a concept, and later turn it into an idea.

A thread about nothing divided against itself cannot stand!

we have to be very careful because the idea of anything cutting into our nothing that could turn into something would force us to give up everything.

Well, that covers a lot of ground. Say, you cover a lot of ground yourself. You better beat it. I hear they're going to tear you down and put up an office building where you're standing. You can leave in a taxi. If you can't get a taxi, you can leave in a huff. If that's too soon, you can leave in a minute and a huff. Y'know, you haven't stop talking since I came here. You must've ben vaccinated with a phonograph needle.

You sir, have got the brain of a four-year-old boy, and I'll bet he was glad to get rid of it.

we might wanna take this outside. well, maybe not.

but two men would.

There is not much hope in achieving nothing.
You can only hope for hopelessness.
That should be your only hope.
Then the nothing is achieved.
Then you can write it off.

Denim- you don't even know what a write off is...

When people say "Beefcake!"

what are they referring to?

Yeah, but they do because their the ones righting it off.

Whoa, back it up. Beep, beep, beep. Are you joking, cousin jeffrey, and if not, why are you asking?

Beep, Beep, Beep? What are you doing?

What we've got here is ......... failure to commun'cate.

In the whole Rove/Plame story, reporters don't seem interested in the specific law Rove is alleged to have violated. Why don't reporters dig deep anymore?

Rove's current defense--that he heard of Plame's covert status from a reporter--is irrelevant. If he turned around and disclosed it to someone not authorized to receive classified info, he's guilty, regardless of where he got it. (see 50 U.S.C., sec. 421). There's only one possible defense to the crime: the government already disclosed the info (50 U.S.C., sec. 422), which in this case, isn't true.

There's a show. That's a show.

Burn him alive!

Well, i'm semi-serious. I don't NEED to know because I never use the expression. First time i heard it was (i'm ashamed to admit) a South Park episode. Since then i've heard people say it a few times. I just don't understand it.

If it was used on South Park then it means absolutely nothing, like everything else from those retards. Enough of this negative talk... can we please get back to more positive discussions..... like burning Karl Rove alive?